• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

WTS PLEASE CLOSE






Status
Not open for further replies.
Location (City)
North Las Vegas

Hiramg702

Active member (5.56mm)
Forum Supporter
2023 Supporter
2024 Supporter
Trading Post Subscriber
Rating - 100%
62   0   0
#1
Selling my like new Rare Breed trigger. I have maybe 200-300 rounds through it. Worked great on my 16” AR15. Took more work to get it to run on my 10.5” AR15. If you have any questions, feel free to PM me.
PRICE DROP $280
FB292D85-C801-4A67-8E2A-F4865A091A80.jpeg


C518343B-066F-451B-9CD8-45097C6A7599.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Glocksterpaulie

The Perfectionist
Forum Supporter
2024 Supporter
Trading Post Subscriber
Rating - 100%
359   0   0
#5
In case you did not know, this is an illegal item to own according to the ATF without the proper license. Punishable with prison time and fines. Go look at: https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/o...en-letter-forced-reset-triggers-frts/download

This item should not be listed on this website and may constitute a crime.


U.S. Department of Justice
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives
Office of Enforcement Programs and Services
Office of Field Operations

March 22, 2022

OPEN LETTER TO ALL FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) recently examined devices
commonly known as “forced reset triggers” (FRTs) and has determined that some of them are
“firearms” and “machineguns” as defined in the National Firearms Act (NFA), and
“machineguns” as defined in the Gun Control Act (GCA).

These particular FRTs are being marketed as replacement triggers for AR-type firearms. Unlike
traditional triggers and binary triggers (sometimes referred to generally as “FRTs”), the subject
FRTs do not require shooters to pull and then subsequently release the trigger to fire a second
shot. Instead, these FRTs utilize the firing cycle to eliminate the need for the shooter to release
the trigger before a second shot is fired. By contrast, some after-market triggers have similar
components but also incorporate a disconnector or similar feature to ensure that the trigger must
be released before a second shot may be fired and may not be machineguns.

Both the NFA and GCA regulate machineguns. “Machinegun” is defined under 26 U.S.C.
§ 5845(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(23) as—
Any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot,
automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the
trigger. The term shall also include the frame or receiver of any such weapon, any part
designed and intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts designed and
intended, for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun, and any combination of
parts from which a machinegun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or
under the control of a person. (Emphasis added.)

ATF’s examination found that some FRT devices allow a firearm to automatically expel more
than one shot with a single, continuous pull of the trigger. For this reason, ATF has concluded
that FRTs that function in this way are a combination of parts designed and intended for use in
converting a weapon into a machinegun, and hence, ATF has classified these devices as a
“machinegun” as defined by the NFA and GCA.

Accordingly, ATF’s position is that any FRT that allows a firearm to automatically expel more
than one shot with a single, continuous pull of the trigger is a “machinegun”, and is accordingly
subject to the GCA prohibitions regarding the possession, transfer, and transport of machineguns

OPEN LETTER TO ALL FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES (cont.)
under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(o) and 922(a)(4). They are also subject to registration, transfer, taxation,
and possession restrictions under the NFA. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861; 27 CFR 479.101.
Under 26 U.S.C. § 5871, any person who violates or fails to comply with the provisions of the
NFA may be fined up to $10,000 per violation and is subject to imprisonment for a term of up to
ten years. Further, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 5872, any machinegun possessed or transferred in
violation of the NFA is subject to seizure and forfeiture. Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2), any
person who violates § 922(o) may be sent to prison for up to 10 years and fined up to $250,000
per person or $500,000 per organization.

Based on ATF’s determination that the FRTs that function as described above are
“machineguns” under the NFA and GCA, ATF intends to take appropriate remedial action with
respect to sellers and possessors of these devices. Current possessors of these devices are
encouraged to contact ATF for further guidance on how they may divest possession. If you are
uncertain whether the device you possess is a machinegun as defined by the GCA and NFA,
please contact your local ATF Field Office. You may consult the local ATF Office’s webpage
for office contact information.
Doesn’t look like the seller is too concerned about it. I believe he knows what he has and is not trying to pull something.
 

Px4Shooter

Well-known member (45 ACP)
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
#6
I'm more worried about a buyer that does not know what their liabilities are. I think it is also safe to say that LEO's monitor these threads and types of websites. Knowledge is power...
Where does it say it is illegal??

The atf letter says “some” FRTs. Not all. And then does not list which ones are. So, either you have the info or you are wrongly criticizing a person’s ad.
 

BillsMafia

Well-known member (45 ACP)
Forum Supporter
2023 Supporter
2024 Supporter
Trading Post Subscriber
Rating - 100%
114   0   0
#7
The company that was selling them has filed a lawsuit against the ATF, but at this time, they are not selling them, have had them confiscated, and are considered against the law without the Class 3 license. Hope this helps.
I believe the lawsuit was actually because another brand copied their design and was selling their own version, at a lower price. At least that was part of it...their name escapes me though
 

Jeff89178

Well-known member (45 ACP)
Forum Supporter
2022 Supporter
2023 Supporter
2024 Supporter
Trading Post Subscriber
Rating - 100%
139   0   0
#8
I believe the lawsuit was actually because another brand copied their design and was selling their own version, at a lower price. At least that was part of it...their name escapes me though
PBG Alamo-15 ( GRAVES TECHNOLOGY )
 

DVSBASTID

Member (9mm)
Rating - 94.7%
18   1   0
#9
There are 2 lawsuits going on currently, rarebreed triggers is suing the aft and mr garland over the legality of an agency to create laws. As it stands now the rarebreed frt-15 the wot and tommy triggers all function in a way that it is not a machine gun by its current legal definition , and they are correct in doing so as the aft added their own language to the nfa and gca to make it fit for the frts to be considered machineguns , That will be a long ongoing lawsuit that hopefully lands in Clarence Thomas's lap.

The other rarebreed triggers has sued big daddy unlimited in a patent lawsuit , rarebreed patented the device and the wot is an exact copy of it. They're winning the suit against bdu . Another thing rarebreed triggers to date has not been raided by the aft but their manufacturers/supplier has. From what I understand they pulled th owner of rbt over with boxes of frts confiscated them and released the owner without charging him with anything.
 

BillsMafia

Well-known member (45 ACP)
Forum Supporter
2023 Supporter
2024 Supporter
Trading Post Subscriber
Rating - 100%
114   0   0
#10
There are 2 lawsuits going on currently, rarebreed triggers is suing the aft and mr garland over the legality of an agency to create laws. As it stands now the rarebreed frt-15 the wot and tommy triggers all function in a way that it is not a machine gun by its current legal definition , and they are correct in doing so as the aft added their own language to the nfa and gca to make it fit for the frts to be considered machineguns , That will be a long ongoing lawsuit that hopefully lands in Clarence Thomas's lap.

The other rarebreed triggers has sued big daddy unlimited in a patent lawsuit , rarebreed patented the device and the wot is an exact copy of it. They're winning the suit against bdu . Another thing rarebreed triggers to date has not been raided by the aft but their manufacturers/supplier has. From what I understand they pulled th owner of rbt over with boxes of frts confiscated them and released the owner without charging him with anything.
Thata what it was - BDU
 

Hiramg702

Active member (5.56mm)
Forum Supporter
2023 Supporter
2024 Supporter
Trading Post Subscriber
Rating - 100%
62   0   0
#15
Okay, real question: What's with the bolt? That's not a stock part.
It's a manual stop to keep function, since the sear weight was lightened. Safety wouldn't work without it due to the sear being shaved.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.