Get your suppressors before the NFA trust changes take effect!

[GunGarage]

If you aren't aware, the ATF last week released a number of proposed changes to the NFA process. This will ultimately require that all 'responsible parties' of an entity (trust or corporation) be fingerprinted, photographed, and require the signature of the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the jurisdiction. These changes have the potential to dramatically increase wait times for NFA purchases. More info is available here: http://soldiersystems.net/2013/09/0...n-nfa-trust-corporate-transfers-means-to-you/

There is no better time than now to purchase that suppressor that you have always wanted. We have a wide variety to choose from, in most calibers and price points.

Our current stock:

.22 LR
Huntertown Arms Guardian 22 - $149
Huntertown Arms B22 - $179
Huntertown Arms Guardian SS - $229
Huntertown Arms Guardian SS Micro - $229
Gemtech Outback IID - $299
Huntertown Arms Kestrel 22 - $319
Tactical Solutions Axiom (also full-auto rated for 5.7, .22 WMR, .17 HMR/HM2) -$349
Gemtech G5-22 - $425
Silencerco Sparrow - $425

9mm
Yankee Hill Machine - M2 Cobra - $525
Gemtech Multimount - $549
SWR Octane 9 - $599
AAC Ti-rant 9- $800

.223/5.56
Huntertown Arms Kestrel 5.56 - $399
Gemtech G5 - $825
AAC Mini-4 - $895
AAC M4-2000 - $989

Huntertown Arms Kestrel 7.62 AK - $425
Huntertown Arms Kestrel .308 - $499​

 

[Jasper]

I found this looking for a question I have about suppressors. This "change" will be very interesting depending on the turnout of Abamski v. US. Along very similar lines when the ATF decided to "change" the law by adding the "actual buyer" question to form 4473.

I would love to see a bunch of challenges similar to this challenge the intention of the law v. "interpretation" of the regulatory bodies. Explicit rights like 2A seem easier than other stuff, but if it was constitutional because of the necessary and proper clause or commerce clause I think it is fair game for a challenge.

 

[stampsm]

I think that case in going to hing on the principle of whether someone can be convicted of lying on a federal form in regards to a question that was added by the ATF on their own and were never authorized by congress to ask on the said federal form. Justice Scalia pointed this out in one of his remarks.